The Kingdom

A Simple Bible Course

Asking in Prayer

Family Prayer Log

New Testament Teaching

What about The Christ

Prepare Child for Baptism

Baptism from Greek

Elders from Greek

Women's Role from Greek

Advice for Spirit-Led Living

The Last Things

The Return

The Reaping of the Earth

Elaine Walker Memorial

HOME

 

PART ONE: JESUS IN AND OUT OF GALILEE
  
PART TWO: JESUS IN JUDEA
 
 

PART THREE: JESUS IN JERUSALEM (AND BEYOND)

 

FOREWORD
This is an attempt to tell the story of Jesus in chronological order. 
   
I believe that all four of the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) are accurate and divinely inspired.   Therefore, I have tried to do no violence to any of the four.
   
Although I have told the story of Jesus in my own words, I have tried to let the words of Jesus shine forth in their true brightness; for His words are pearls of wisdom, diamonds of truth, emeralds of hope, and rubies of love.
   
I have leaned heavily on the “New International Version of the Holy Bible,” published by Zondervan Bible Publishers of Grand Rapids, Michigan.  Most of the quotations are taken from the NIV, and are indicated as being from that source.
   
A few of the quotations come from other versions, and I tried to show from which version all the sizable quotes are taken.  Occasionally, I translated a passage myself, and in that case, there is no notation as to the source of the translation.
   
I assume that the gospels were written in the following order:
        1.  The gospel of Matthew
        2.  The Gospel of Luke
        3.   The Gospel of Mark
        4.   The Gospel of John.
   
In addition to historical reasons for thinking that this is the order in which they were written, there is internal evidence that supports this order as well.
   
I have heard that about 80% of Mark’s material can be found almost word for word in either the gospel of Matthew or the gospel of Luke.  Although I have not checked out the percentage, I estimate that 80% is about right. 
   
It is unreasonable to think that Matthew and Luke sat together and said to each other, “I will take this verse from Mark, and you take that verse,” or “I’ll take this phrase from Mark, and you take that phrase.”  It seems highly improbable that something like that took place, but it would have taken place if Mark were the first of the three.
   
Therefore, the material passed, not from the Gospel of Mark to the gospels of Matthew and Luke, but the other way around. It flowed from Matthew and Luke to Mark. Thus, Mark wrote his gospel after Matthew and Luke had already written their gospels, and he used wording from each of them.
   
John’s gospel was the last of the four to be written.  This is shown by the fact that John avoided, for the most part, material that had already been given in the earlier gospels.  John tells some of the additional things that Jesus did and said, in addition to what was told in the three previous gospels.
   
In telling the story of Jesus, I have tried to follow the order of events as presented by the Gospel of Mark.  I chose Mark to be my guide because I think he was the last of the three synoptic writers to write and had, presumably, the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke before him as he wrote.
   
I realize, of course, that no one can do justice to the story of Jesus.  It has been said that the story of Jesus is “the greatest story ever told.”  I am sure this is true, because Jesus was the greatest person that has ever lived.
   
The questions at the end of each chapter are designed to encourage readers to think about Jesus and to answer for themselves the question, which He asked, “What do you think about the Christ?”

Richard Walker
Lubbock, Texas
March 11, 2005